May 28, 2022 Last Updated 1:04 PM, May 27, 2022
× Welcome to the Law of One Forum!

Tell us and our members who you are, what you like and suggest any other topic that you may like on this site.

We welcome all new members/seekers and hope to see you around a lot.
Please be courteous to one another and keep discussions to the progression of self and the upliftment of others.

Let's make Love lead the way, not hate. Embrace all and seek the Light!

Much Love & Understanding

Law of One Society
In Love/Light

Pondering the Polarization Paradox

More
30 May 2019 15:04 #44 by Theo
Theo created the topic: Pondering the Polarization Paradox
OK...according to Ra, the purpose of incarnation is to "seek and become one with the creator" even though the separation is itself an illusion because the infinite creator is ALL things and I or we cannot exist outside of that. Got it.

This path towards spiritual evolution involves the awareness of unity and behaving accordingly. This means treating all as one. The trick is, in order to do this, we need the appearance of individuation to establish a me and a you so that I can come to the conclusion that there is no me and you. Got it.

So, in order to live in accord with the law of one, I need to polarize towards service to all, which is ultimately service to self because all is one. The implication of polarizing towards something means I am also polarizing away from something else. This means that in order to realize unity, I must operate in duality even though duality is the illusion I am trying to awaken from. Meep.

Duality, then, is just a tool for our growth. Everything other than "me" is a point of reference that I can use for self definition as something I am or am not. The problem is that by fashioning a specific polarized identity from a field of all possible identities as a way to seek unity, I reinforce individuality and therefore duality. Unity will not help me realize unity. Duality will.

It all sounds very confusing and contradictory, but I find comfort with Ra's statement that this "is not a dimension of knowing" (61.9) and that, "The proper role of the entity is in this density to experience all things desired, to then analyze, understand, and accept these experiences, distilling from them the love/light within them. Nothing shall be overcome. That which is not needed falls away."(18.5).

Not so much a paradox resolved as reframed.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.125 seconds