Oct 23, 2017 Last Updated 11:41 PM, Oct 23, 2017

Our Milky Way Galaxy: Its Application of The Law Of One, Its Densities and Planets Therein

Published in The Universe
Read 568 times

The Law of One, Book I, Session 16

Questioner: I was wondering how many inhabited planets there are in our galaxy and if they all reach higher density by the Law of One?

It doesn’t seem that there would be any other way to reach higher density? Is this correct?


Ra: I am Ra. Please restate your query.

Questioner: How many inhabited planets are there in our galaxy?

Ra: I am Ra. We are assuming that you intend all dimensions of consciousness or densities of awareness in this question.

Approximately one-fifth of all planetary entities contain awareness of one or more densities

Some planets are hospitable only for certain densities.

Your planet, for instance, is at this time hospitable for densities one, two, three, and four.

Questioner: Roughly how many total planets in this galaxy of stars that we are in are aware regardless of density?

Ra: I am Ra. Approximately 67 million.

Questioner: Can you tell me what percentage of those are third, fourth, fifth, sixth etc., density?

Ra: I am Ra.

A percentage seventeen for first density,
a percentage twenty for second density,
a percentage twenty-seven for third density,
a percentage sixteen for fourth density,
a percentage six for fifth density.

The other information must be withheld.

Questioner: Of these first five densities, have all of the planets progressed from the third density by knowledge and application of the Law of One?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: Then the only way for a planet to get out of the situation that we are in is for the population to become aware of and start practicing the Law of One. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: Can you tell me what percentage of the third-, fourth-, and fifth-density planets which you have spoken of here are polarized negatively towards service to self?

Ra: I am Ra. This is not a query to which we may speak given the Law of Confusion.

We may say only that the negatively or self-service oriented planetary spheres are much fewer.

To give you exact numbers would not be appropriate.

Questioner: I would like to make an analogy as to why there are fewer negatively oriented, and then ask you if the analogy is good.

In a positively oriented society with service to others, it would be simple to move a large boulder by getting everyone to help move it. In a society oriented towards service to self, it would be much more difficult to get everyone to work for the good of all to move the boulder; therefore, it is much easier to get things done to create the service to others principle and to grow in positively oriented communities than in negatively oriented communities.

Is this correct?


Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: Can you tell me if the progression of life in other galaxies is similar to the progression of life in our galaxy?

Ra: I am Ra. The progression is somewhat close to the same, asymptotically approaching congruency throughout infinity.

The free choosing of what you would call galactic systems causes variations of an extremely minor nature from one of your galaxies to another.

Questioner: Then the Law of One is truly universal in creating a progression towards the eighth density in all galaxies. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. There are infinite forms, infinite understandings, but the progression is one.

Questioner: I am assuming that it is not necessary for an individual to understand the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. It is absolutely necessary that an entity consciously realize it does not understand in order for it to be harvestable.

Understanding is not of this density.

Questioner: That is a very important point. I used the wrong word.

What I meant to say was that I believed that it was not necessary for an entity to be consciously aware of the Law of One to go from the third to the fourth density.


Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: At what point in the densities is it necessary for an entity to be consciously aware of the Law of One in order to progress?

Ra: I am Ra. The fifth density harvest is of those whose vibratory distortions consciously accept the honor/duty of the Law of One.

This responsibility/honor is the foundation of this vibration.

Questioner: Can you tell me a little more about this honor/responsibility concept?

Ra: I am Ra. Each responsibility is an honor; each honor, a responsibility.

The Law of One, Book II, Session 28

Questioner: Thank you.

Does a unit of consciousness, an individualized unit of consciousness, create a unit of the creation? I will give an example.


One individualized consciousness creates one galaxy of stars, the type that has many millions of stars in it. Does this happen?

Ra: I am Ra. This can happen. The possibilities are infinite.

Thus a Logos may create what you call a star system or it may be the Logos creating billions of star systems.

This is the cause of the confusion in the term galaxy, for there are many different Logos entities or creations and we would call each, using your sound vibration complexes, a galaxy.

Questioner: Let’s take as an example the planet that we are on now and tell me how much of the creation was created by the same Logos that created this planet?

Ra: I am Ra. This planetary Logos is a strong Logos creating approximately 250 billion of your star systems for Its creation.

The, shall we say, laws or physical ways of this creation will remain, therefore, constant.

Questioner: Then what you are saying is that the lenticular star system which we call a galaxy that we find ourselves in with approximately 250 billion other suns like our own was created by a single Logos. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: Since there are many individualized portions of consciousness in this lenticular galaxy, did this Logos then subdivide into more individualization of consciousness to create these consciousnesses?

Ra: I am Ra. You are perceptive.

This is also correct although an apparent paradox.

Questioner: Could you tell me what you mean by an apparent paradox?

Ra: I am Ra. It would seem that if one Logos creates the intelligent energy ways for a large system there would not be the necessity or possibility of the further sub-Logos differentiation.

However, within limits, this is precisely the case, and it is perceptive that this has been seen.

Questioner: Thank you.

I’ll call the lenticular galaxy that we are in the major galaxy just so we will not get mixed up in our terms.

Does all the consciousness in individualized form that goes into what we are calling the major galaxy start out and go through all of the densities in order, one-twothree- four-five-six-seven and into the eighth, or are there some who start up higher in the rank so that there is always a mixture of intelligent consciousness in the galaxy?


Ra: I am Ra. The latter is more nearly correct.

In each beginning
there is the beginning from infinite strength.
Free will acts as a catalyst.
Beings begin to form the universes.
Consciousness then begins to have the potential to experience.

The potentials of experience are created as a part of intelligent energy and are fixed before experience begins.

However, there is always, due to free will acting infinitely upon the creation, a great variation in initial responses to intelligent energy’s potential.

Thus almost immediately the foundations of the, shall we call it, hierarchical nature of beings begins to manifest as some portions of consciousness or awareness learn through experience in a much more efficient manner.

Questioner: Is there any reason for some portions being much more efficient in learning?

Ra: I am Ra. Is there any reason for some to learn more quickly than others?

Look, if you wish, to the function of the will … the, shall we say, attraction to the upward spiraling line of light.

Questioner: I am assuming that there are eight densities created when this major galaxy was created. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is basically correct.

However, it is well to perceive that the eighth density functions also as the beginning density or first density, in its latter stages, of the next octave of densities.

Questioner: Are you saying then that there are an infinite number of octaves of densities one through eight?

Ra: I am Ra. We wish to establish that we are truly humble messengers of the Law of One.

We can speak to you of our experiences and our understandings and teach/learn in limited ways.

However, we cannot speak in firm knowledge of all the creations.

We know only that they are infinite.

We assume an infinite number of octaves.

However, it has been impressed upon us by our own teachers that there is a mystery-clad unity of creation in which all consciousness periodically coalesces and again begins.

Thus we can only say we assume an infinite progression though we understand it to be cyclical in nature and, as we have said, clad in mystery.

Questioner: Thank you.

When this major galaxy is formed by the Logos, polarity then exists in a sense that we have electrical polarity.


We do have electrical polarity existing at that time. Is that correct?

Ra: I am Ra. I accept this as correct with the stipulation that what you term electrical be understood as not only the one, Larson, stipulated its meaning but also in what you would call the metaphysical sense.

Questioner: Are you saying then that we have not only a polarity of electrical charge but also a polarity in consciousness at that time?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

All is potentially available from the beginning of your physical space/time;

it then being the function of consciousness complexes to begin to use the physical materials to gain experience to then polarize in a metaphysical sense.

The potentials for this are not created by the experiencer but by intelligent energy.

This will be the last full question of this session due to our desire to foster this instrument as it slowly regains physical complex energy.

May we ask if you have one or two questions we may answer shortly before we close?

Questioner: I am assuming that the process of creation, after the original creation of the major galaxy, is continued by the further individualization of the consciousness of the Logos so that there are many, many portions of the individualized consciousness creating further items for experience all over the galaxy.

Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct, for within the, shall we say, guidelines or ways of the Logos, the sub-Logos may find various means of differentiating experiences without removing or adding to these ways.

Last modified on Thursday, 13 April 2017 17:41
Login to post comments

Most Read

What is The Law of One?

What is The Law of One?

14 Sep 2015 3rd Density Lessons

The Creation and The Striving Towards Growth & Awareness

The Creation and The Striving Towar…

17 Sep 2015 3rd Density Lessons

Who Are The Orion Group?

Who Are The Orion Group?

15 Sep 2015 Higher Density Lessons

Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype 1: Matrix of The Mind - The Magician

Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype…

04 Jul 2016 Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype 1-7

Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype 3: Catalyst Of The Mind - The Empress

Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype…

04 Jul 2016 Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype 1-7

Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype 4: Experience Of The Mind - The Emperor

Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype…

04 Jul 2016 Ra's In-depth Analysis of Archetype 1-7