The Physics of Dewey Larson
The Law of One, Book I, Session 20
Questioner: Speaking of the rapid change that occurred in the physical vehicle from second to third density: this occurred, you said, in approximately a generation and a half.
Body hair was lost and there were structural changes.
I am aware of the physics of Dewey B. Larson, who states that all is motion or vibration.
Am I correct in assuming that the basic vibration that makes up the physical world changes, thus creating a different set of parameters, shall I say, in this short period of time between density changes allowing for the new type of being?
Am I correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
Questioner: Is the physics of Dewey Larson correct?
Ra: I am Ra. The physics of sound vibrational complex, Dewey, is a correct system as far as it is able to go.
There are those things which are not included in this system.
However, those coming after this particular entity, using the basic concepts of vibration and the study of vibrational distortions, will begin to understand that which you know as gravity and those things you consider as “n” dimensions.
These things are necessary to be included in a more universal, shall we say, physical theory.
Questioner: Did this entity, Dewey, then bring this material through for use primarily in the fourth density?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
The Law of One, Book II, Session 27
Questioner: I will make a statement that I have extracted from the physics of Dewey Larson which may or may not be close to what we are trying to explain.
Larson says that all is motion which we can take as vibration, and that vibration is pure vibration and is not physical in any way or in any form or density, and the first product of that vibration is what we call the photon or particle of light.
I am trying to make an analogy between this physical solution and the concept of love and light.
Is this close to the concept of Love creating light?
Ra: I am Ra. You are correct.
The Law of One, Book II, Session 28
Questioner: I may be backtracking a little today because I think that possibly we are at the most important part of what we are doing in trying to make it apparent how everything is one, how it comes from one intelligent infinity.
This is difficult, so please bear with my errors in questioning.
The concept that I have right now of the process, using both what you have told me and some of Dewey Larson’s material having to do with the physics of the process, is that intelligent infinity expands outward from all locations everywhere.
It expands outward uniformly like the surface of a bubble or a balloon expanding outward from every point everywhere.
It expands outward at what is called unit velocity or the velocity of light.
This is Larson’s idea of the progression of what he calls space/time.
Is this concept correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This concept is incorrect as is any concept of the one intelligent infinity.
This concept is correct in the context of one particular Logos, or Love, or focus of this Creator which has chosen Its, shall we say, natural laws and ways of expressing them mathematically and otherwise.
The one undifferentiated intelligent infinity, unpolarized, full and whole, is the macrocosm of the mystery-clad being.
We are messengers of the Law of One.
at this approximation of understanding, cannot be specified by any physics but only become activated or potentiated intelligent infinity due to the catalyst of free will.
This may be difficult to accept.
However, the understandings we have to share begin and end in mystery.
Questioner: Yesterday we had arrived at a point where we were considering colors of light. You said:
“The nature of the vibratory patterns of your universe is dependent upon the configurations placed upon the original material or light by the focus or Love using Its intelligent energy to create a certain pattern of illusions or densities in order to satisfy Its own intelligent estimate of a method of knowing Itself.”
Then after this you said that there was more material that you would be happy to share, but we ran out of time.
Could you give us further information on that?
Ra: I am Ra. In discussing this information we then, shall we say, snap back into the particular methods of understanding or seeing that which the one, sound vibration complex, Dewey, offers; this being correct for the second meaning of intelligent infinity: the potential which then through catalyst forms the kinetic.
This information is a natural progression of inspection of the kinetic shape of your environment.
You may understand each color or ray as being, as we had said, a very specific and accurate portion of intelligent energy’s representation of intelligent infinity, each ray having been previously inspected in other regards .
This information may be of aid here.
We speak now nonspecifically to increase the depth of your conceptualization of the nature of what is.
The universe in which you live is recapitulation in each part of intelligent infinity.
Thus you will see the same patterns repeated in physical and metaphysical areas; the rays or portions of light being, as you surmise, those areas of what you may call the physical illusion which rotate, vibrate, or are of a nature that may be, shall we say, counted or categorized in rotation manner in space/time as described by the one known as Dewey; some substances having various of the rays in a physical manifestation visible to the eye, this being apparent in the nature of your crystallized minerals which you count as precious, the ruby being red and so forth.
Questioner: This light occurred as a consequence of vibration which is a consequence of Love.
I am going to ask if that statement is correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This statement is correct.
Questioner: This light then can condense into material as we know it into our density, into all of our chemical elements because of rotations of the vibration at quantized units or intervals of angular velocity. Is this correct?
Ra: I am Ra. This is quite correct.
Questioner: Thank you.
I am wondering, what is the catalyst or the activator of the rotation?
What causes the rotation so that light condenses into our physical or chemical elements?
Ra: I am Ra. It is necessary to consider the enabling function of the focus known as Love.
This energy is of an ordering nature.
It orders in a cumulative way from greater to lesser so that when Its universe, as you may call it, is complete, the manner of development of each detail is inherent in the living light and thus will develop in such and such a way; your own universe having been well-studied in an empirical fashion by those you call your scientists and having been understood or visualized, shall we say, with greater accuracy by the understandings or visualizations of the one known as Dewey.
Questioner: Thank you.
When this major galaxy is formed by the Logos, polarity then exists in a sense that we have electrical polarity.
We do have electrical polarity existing at that time. Is that correct?
Ra: I am Ra. I accept this as correct with the stipulation that what you term electrical be understood as not only the one, Larson, stipulated its meaning but also in what you would call the metaphysical sense.
Questioner: Are you saying then that we have not only a polarity of electrical charge but also a polarity in consciousness at that time?
Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.
All is potentially available from the beginning of your physical space/time;
it then being the function of consciousness complexes to begin to use the physical materials to gain experience to then polarize in a metaphysical sense.
The potentials for this are not created by the experiencer but by intelligent energy.
This will be the last full question of this session due to our desire to foster this instrument as it slowly regains physical complex energy.
May we ask if you have one or two questions we may answer shortly before we close?
The Law of One, Book II, Session 41
Questioner: Could you tell me the difference between space/time and time/space?
Ra: I am Ra. Using your words, the difference is that between the visible and invisible or the physical and metaphysical.
Using mathematical terms, as does the one you call Larson, the difference is that between s/t and t/s.