Basic Understanding of The Creation of Universes & Their Corresponding Octaves

The Law of One, Book II, Session 28

Questioner: Thank you. 

Does a unit of consciousness, an individualized unit of consciousness, create a unit of the creation? 

I will give an example.

One individualized consciousness creates one galaxy of stars, the type that has many millions of stars in it. 

Does this happen?

Ra: I am Ra. This can happen. 

The possibilities are infinite. 

Thus a Logos may create what you call a star system or it may be the Logos creating billions of star systems. 

This is the cause of the confusion in the term galaxy, for there are many different Logos entities or creations and we would call each, using your sound vibration complexes, a galaxy.

Questioner: Let’s take as an example the planet that we are on now and tell me how much of the creation was created by the same Logos that created this planet?

Ra: I am Ra. This planetary Logos is a strong Logos creating approximately 250 billion of your star systems for Its creation. 

The, shall we say, laws or physical ways of this creation will remain, therefore, constant.

Questioner: Then what you are saying is that the lenticular star system which we call a galaxy that we find ourselves in with approximately 250 billion other suns like our own was created by a single Logos. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: Since there are many individualized portions of consciousness in this lenticular galaxy, did this Logos then subdivide into more individualization of consciousness to create these consciousnesses?

Ra: I am Ra. You are perceptive. 

This is also correct although an apparent paradox.

Questioner: Could you tell me what you mean by an apparent paradox?

Ra: I am Ra. It would seem that if one Logos creates the intelligent energy ways for a large system there would not be the necessity or possibility of the further sub-Logos differentiation. 

However, within limits, this is precisely the case, and it is perceptive that this has been seen.

Questioner: Thank you. 

I’ll call the lenticular galaxy that we are in the major galaxy just so we will not get mixed up in our terms. 

Does all the consciousness in individualized form that goes into what we are calling the major galaxy start out and go through all of the densities in order, one-two-three- four-five-six-seven and into the eighth, or are there some who start up higher in the rank so that there is always a mixture of intelligent consciousness in the galaxy?

Ra: I am Ra. The latter is more nearly correct. 

In each beginning 
there is the beginning from infinite strength. 
Free will acts as a catalyst. 
Beings begin to form the universes. 
Consciousness then begins to have the potential to experience. 

The potentials of experience are created as a part of intelligent energy and are fixed before experience begins.

However, there is always, due to free will acting infinitely upon the creation, a great variation in initial responses to intelligent energy’s potential. 

Thus almost immediately the foundations of the, shall we call it, hierarchical nature of beings begins to manifest as some portions of consciousness or awareness learn through experience in a much more efficient manner.

Questioner: Is there any reason for some portions being much more efficient in learning?

Ra: I am Ra. Is there any reason for some to learn more quickly than others?

Look, if you wish, 

to the function of the will … 
the, shall we say, attraction to the upward spiraling line of light.

Questioner: I am assuming that there are eight densities created when this major galaxy was created. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is basically correct. 

However, it is well to perceive that the eighth density functions also as the beginning density or first density, in its latter stages, of the next octave of densities.

Questioner: Are you saying then that there are an infinite number of octaves of densities one through eight?

Ra: I am Ra. We wish to establish that we are truly humble messengers of the Law of One. 

We can speak to you of our experiences and our understandings and teach/learn in limited ways. 

However, we cannot speak in firm knowledge of all the creations. 

We know only that they are infinite.

We assume an infinite number of octaves.

However, it has been impressed upon us by our own teachers that there is a mystery-clad unity of creation in which all consciousness periodically coalesces and again begins. 

Thus we can only say we assume an infinite progression though we understand it to be cyclical in nature and, as we have said, clad in mystery.

Questioner: Thank you. 

When this major galaxy is formed by the Logos, polarity then exists in a sense that we have electrical polarity. 

We do have electrical polarity existing at that time. Is that correct?

Ra: I am Ra. I accept this as correct with the stipulation that what you term electrical be understood as not only the one, Larson, stipulated its meaning but also in what you would call the metaphysical sense.

Questioner: Are you saying then that we have not only a polarity of electrical charge but also a polarity in consciousness at that time?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct. 

All is potentially available from the beginning of your physical space/time; 

it then being the function of consciousness complexes to begin to use the physical materials to gain experience to then polarize in a metaphysical sense. 

The potentials for this are not created by the experiencer but by intelligent energy.

This will be the last full question of this session due to our desire to foster this instrument as it slowly regains physical complex energy. 

May we ask if you have one or two questions we may answer shortly before we close?

Questioner: I am assuming that the process of creation, after the original creation of the major galaxy, is continued by the further individualization of the consciousness of the Logos so that there are many, many portions of the individualized consciousness creating further items for experience all over the galaxy. 

Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct, for within the, shall we say, guidelines or ways of the Logos, the sub-Logos may find various means of differentiating experiences without removing or adding to these ways.

The Law of One, Book II, Session 29

Questioner: Is it possible for you to give me an example of various planetary developments in what I would call a metaphysical sense having to do with the development of consciousness and its polarities throughout the galaxy? 

In other words I believe that some of these planets develop quite rapidly into higher density planets and some take longer times. 

Can you give me some idea of that development?

Ra: I am Ra. This will be the final full query of this session.

The particular Logos of your major galaxy has used a large portion of Its coalesced material to reflect the being-ness of the Creator. 

In this way there is much of your galactic system which does not have the progression of which you speak but dwells spiritually as a portion of the Logos. 

Of those entities upon which consciousness dwells there is, as you surmise, a variety of time/space periods during which the higher densities of experience are attained by consciousness.

Is there any short query further before we close?

The Law of One, Book II, Session 30

Questioner: Thank you. 

You stated yesterday that much of this major galactic system dwells spiritually as a part of the Logos. 

Do you mean that near the center of this major galactic system that the stars there do not have planetary systems? Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. This is incorrect. 

The Logos has distributed itself throughout your galactic system. 

However, the time/space continua of some of your more central sun systems are much further advanced.

Questioner: Well then, could you generally say that as you get closer to the center of this major system that there is a greater spiritual density or spiritual quality in that area?

Ra: I am Ra. This will be the last full question of this session as this instrument is somewhat uncomfortable. 

We do not wish to deplete the instrument.

The spiritual density or mass of those more towards the center of your galaxy is known. 

However, this is due simply to the varying timelessness states during which the planetary spheres may coalesce, this process of space/time beginnings occurring earlier, shall we say, as you approach the center of the galactic spiral.

The Law of One, Book III, Session 71

Questioner: If an entity has chosen the negative polarization are the processes of healing and review similar for the negative path?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

Questioner: Are the processes that we are talking about processes that occur on many planets in our Milky Way Galaxy, or do they occur on all planets, or what percentage?

Ra: I am Ra. These processes occur upon all planets which have given birth to sub-Logoi such as yourselves. 

The percentage of inhabited planets is approximately 10%.

The Law of One, Book IV, Session 78

Questioner: Why do the densities have the qualities that they have? 

You have named the densities with respect to their qualities, the next density being that of love and so on. 

Can you tell me why these qualities exist in that form? 

Is it possible to answer that question?

Ra: I am Ra. It is possible.

Questioner: Will you please answer that?

Ra: I am Ra. The nature of the vibratory range peculiar to each quantum of the octave is such that the characteristics of it may be described with the same certainty with which you perceive a color with your optical apparatus if it is functioning properly.

Questioner: So the original evolution then was planned by the Logos but the first distortion was not extended to the product. 

At some point this first distortion was extended and the first service-to-self polarity emerged. 

Is this correct and if so, could you tell me the history of this process of emergence?

Ra: I am Ra. As proem let me state that the Logoi always conceived of themselves as offering free will to the sub-Logoi in their care. 

The sub-Logoi had freedom to experience and experiment with consciousness, the experiences of the body, and the illumination of the spirit. 

That having been said, we shall speak to the point of your query.

The first Logos to instill what you now see as free will, in the full sense, in its sub-Logoi came to this creation due to contemplation in depth of the concepts or possibilities of conceptualizations of what we have called the significators. 

The Logos posited the possibility of the mind, the body, and the spirit as being complex. 

In order for the significator to be what it is not, it then must be granted the free will of the Creator. 

This set in motion a quite lengthy, in your terms, series of Logos’s improving or distilling this seed thought. 

The key was the significator becoming a complex.

Questioner: Then our particular Logos, when it created Its own particular creation, was at some point far down the evolutionary spiral of the experiment with the significator becoming what it was not and, therefore, I am assuming, was primarily concerned in designing the archetypes in such a way that they would create the acceleration of this polarization. 

Is this in any way correct?

Ra: I am Ra. We would only comment briefly. 

It is generally correct. 

You may fruitfully view each Logos and its design as the Creator experiencing Itself. 

The seed concept of the significator being a complex introduces two things: 

firstly, the Creator against Creator 
in one sub-Logos in what you may call dynamic tension; 

secondly, the concept of free will, 
once having been made fuller by its extension into the sub-Logoi known as mind/body/spirit complexes, creates and re-creates and continues to create as a function of its very nature. 

The Law of One, Book IV, Session 82

Questioner: I would like to consider the condition at a time or position just prior to the beginning of this octave of experience.

I am assuming that, just prior to the beginning of this octave, intelligent infinity had created and already experienced one or more previous octaves. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. You assume correctly.

However, the phrase would more informatively read, infinite intelligence had experienced previous octaves.

Questioner: Does Ra have any knowledge of the number of previous octaves; if so, how many?

Ra: I am Ra. As far as we are aware we are in an infinite creation.

There is no counting.

Questioner: That’s what I thought you might say.

Am I correct in assuming that at the beginning of this octave, out of what I would call a void of space, seeds of an infinite number of galactic systems such as the Milky Way Galaxy appeared and grew in spiral fashion simultaneously?

Ra: I am Ra. There are duple areas of potential confusion.

Firstly, let us say that the basic concept is reasonably well-stated.

Now we address the confusions.

The nature of true simultaneity is such that, indeed, all is simultaneous.

However, in your modes of perception you would perhaps more properly view the seeding of the creation as that of growth from the center or core outward.

The second confusion lies in the term, ‘void’.

We would substitute the noun, ‘plenum’.

Questioner: Then, if I were observing the beginning of the octave at that time through a telescope, say from this position, would I see the center of many, many galaxies appearing and each of them then spreading outward in a spiraling fashion over what we would consider billions of years, but the spirals spreading outward in approximately what we would consider the same rate so that all these galaxies began as the first speck of light at the same time and then spread out at roughly the same rate?

Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra. The query has confusing elements.

There is a center to infinity.

From this center all spreads.

Therefore,

there are centers to the creation,
to the galaxies,
to star systems,
to planetary systems, and
to consciousness.

In each case you may see growth from the center outward. 

Thus you may see your query as being over-general in concept.

Questioner: Considering only our Milky Way Galaxy at its beginnings, I will assume that the first occurrence that we could find with our physical apparatus was the appearance of a star of the nature of our sun. Is this correct?

Ra: I am Ra.

In the case of the galactic systems
the first manifestation of the Logos is a cluster of central systems which generate the outward swirling energies producing, in their turn, further energy centers for the Logos or what you would call stars.

Questioner: Are these central original creations or clusters what we call stars?

Ra: I am Ra. This is correct.

However, the closer to the, shall we say, beginning of the manifestation of the Logos the star is, the more it partakes in the one original thought.

Questioner: Why does this partaking in the original thought have a gradient radially outward?

That’s the way I understand your statement.

Ra: I am Ra. This is the plan of the one infinite Creator.

The One Original Thought is the harvest of all previous, if you would use this term, experience of the Creator by the Creator.

As It decides to know Itself It generates Itself, into that plenum full of the glory and the power of the one infinite Creator which is manifested to your perceptions as space or outer space.

Each generation of this knowing begets a knowing which has the capacity, through free will, to choose methods of knowing Itself.

Therefore, gradually, step by step, the Creator becomes that which may know Itself, and the portions of the Creator partake less purely in the power of the original word or thought.

The Creator does not properly create as much as It experiences Itself.